Accounting for emissions for financial institutions



Key points:

  • Financial institutions have a crucial role to play in redirecting capital flows towards decarbonising the global economy. It is estimated that 35 global banks contributed to growing emissions by financing fossil fuels with USD 2.7 trillion between 2016 to 2019.
  • As more financial institutions make climate alignment commitments, an array of methodologies, platforms and tools has emerged to monitor and report their progress in achieving alignment with climate targets.
  • In May 2020, an international group of institutional investors with a commitment to transitioning investment portfolios to net-zero emissions by 2050 called for convergence in the measurement methods. 

What is emissions accounting?

Emissions accounting, also known as carbon accounting, is commonly used by governments, corporations and other entities to measure emissions associated with business activities. The Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Protocol Corporate Accounting and Reporting Standard provides a common definition of three scopes of business emissions, depending on the source of emissions and where in an organisation’s value chain they occur:

  • Scope 1: Direct GHG emissions that occur from sources that are owned or controlled by the reporting company, e.g. emissions from combustion in owned or controlled boilers, furnaces, vehicles, etc.
  • Scope 2: Indirect GHG emissions from the generation of purchased or acquired electricity, steam, heating or cooling consumed by the reporting company. Scope 2 emissions physically occur at the facility where the electricity, steam, heating or cooling is generated.
  • Scope 3: All other indirect GHG emissions (not included in scope 2) that occur in the value chain of the reporting company. Scope 3 can be split into upstream emissions that occur in the supply chain (from production or extraction of purchased materials, say) and downstream emissions that occur as a consequence of the use of an organisation’s products or services. For example, scope 3 emissions might include greenhouse gases emitted from the burning of oil produced by an oil company. Often a company’s scope 3 emissions far outweigh its scope 1 and 2 emissions. 

Most businesses in the financial sector calculate and report scope 1 and 2 emissions. Where financial institutions calculate and report scope 3 emissions, the accounting is often restricted to the indirect emissions from their inputs (paper, purchasing, transport) and does not consider the emissions generated by their financial activities. 

Emissions associated with loans and investments are the most significant part of a financial institution’s emissions inventory. This is commonly known as “financed emissions” and the accounting of these is crucial in helping the finance sector understand its exposure to climate risk.

Types of financial institutions and their exposure to climate risk

The finance sector can be broadly categorised based on three activities: lending, investing and advisory services. Measuring finance emissions is crucial to the financial sector gaining a better understanding of the climate risks in investments. Climate is now a well recognised category of financial risk, since the G20 Financial Stability Board released its guidance on climate-related financial disclosures. New carbon reduction policies, renewable technologies, demand for low-carbon products and, importantly, the physical impacts of climate change, can all impact the performance of an investment. Consistent measurement of carbon exposure will:

The table below outlines typical institutions in each segment of the industry, plus examples of some potential impacts of climate change to their business activities.

Outline of financial segments

Why and how do institutions measure financed emissions 

Though the concept of finance emissions has been in active development since 2005, there is still no universal approach to measuring emissions from finance activities. Instead, a plethora of recommendations, guidances and initiatives have been created for a range of purposes and actors in the finance sector. 

Currently, ways for measuring finance emissions have been developed to serve six main purposes

  1. Setting the benchmark for high-level commitments to act 
  2. Measuring financed emissions
  3. Scenario analysis
  4. Target setting
  5. Enabling climate action
  6. Reporting 
Existing initiatives associated with financed emissions

Conclusion

Financial institutions have the power to shape climate action for decades to come by controlling the flow of capital. It is more important than ever that the financial industry understands where and how to measure its progress on achieving decarbonisation targets in a consistent way. Among the many tools, recommendations and guidelines set out above, currently only the Science Based Targets Initiative provides accreditation for aligning investors with a 1.5°C trajectory (and only for the power sector, though it is working to expand its method to the heavy industry, paper and buildings sectors). 

There are a broad range of tools, initiatives and standards available to support financial institutions on climate action, there is yet very little consensus on the method and approach to accounting for financed emissions. 

For further guidance on navigating the myriad initiatives, please see the guide on finance initiatives by the Partnership for Carbon Accounting Financials.

Download Article as PDF

Share this article

Other recent publications:

Risks & rewards of Just Energy Transition Partnerships

Key Points Just Energy Transition Partnerships (JETPs) are a pioneering approach that could ensure effective financing for a just transition…

Read More >





G7 economies increasingly exposed to climate risks through supply chains

Key points G7 economies warn that supply chains are highly exposed to cross-border climate riskImports from Africa, Latin America, Asia…

Read More >