Oil and gas fuelling extreme weather in Brazil
Attribution studies confirm the impact of fossil fuel-driven climate change on the intensity and frequency of droughts and floods.
Coal has historically dominated the global energy mix and maintains a strong presence in Asia’s generation profile.[1]In this briefing Asia largely refers to East Asia. Southeast Asia and South Asia except when noted otherwise. As Asia Pacific’s energy needs grow, installed capacity has increased across all energy technologies, more than doubling cumulative capacity from 2010 to 2023. However, the pace at which each technology has grown varies greatly, which is starting to reshape the region’s energy mix.
Although coal generation has grown over the last two decades – and still represents the largest part of Asia’s cumulative installed capacity – its share of the energy mix has fallen from 50% in 2010 to around 40% in 2023, above the global average of 25%. Coal’s market share has been eroded primarily by the rapid growth of wind and solar power. Solar has grown, on average, at 50% year-on-year from 2010 to 2023, reaching 21% of installed capacity in 2023, according to data from BloombergNEF (figure 1).
Despite the growing use of renewable power in Asia, the continuing expansion of coal – the most carbon-intensive fossil fuel – is concerning. The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) has assessed that to reach the 1.5oC Paris Agreement goal, Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) countries must phase out existing coal plants by 2030 and non-OECD countries by 2040. This will require a rapid phase-down across Asia.
New coal plants continue to be added to the pipeline, especially in countries with strong growth of power demand such as China and India (figure 2). China and India also represent the majority of coal capacity currently in operation, with much of this provided by young plants commissioned within the last 20 years, roughly the amount of time it takes for a coal asset to recoup its initial investment costs (figure 3).
The age of a country’s coal fleet is important to its transition planning because it impacts the financing needed to decommission assets. In general, it becomes cheaper to retire a coal plant once the initial investment of a coal plant has been recouped, though some studies have shown that the details of coal-to-clean transactions can impact this dynamic. The average time it takes to recover this capital is up to 20 years, after which the cost of retiring a coal plant depends mostly on system reliability as well as supply and demand dynamics and any power purchase agreements.[2]Other papers have also looked into the payback period for China and India.
Using 20 years as the average payback period, if no new coal is added to Asia’s existing coal fleet, by 2040, 90% of the fleet would be older than 20 years and can be feasibly retired, based on data from the Global Energy Monitor.
However, if the coal plants currently in the pipeline (pre-permit, permitted and under construction) come online, then the proportion of coal plants that are younger than 20 years by 2040 will increase from 10% to 30%. This greatly raises the cost of transitioning from coal to clean energy. Many governments have already recognised this, leading to steps such as the G7 banning or limiting public funding for coal power, but further measures are required to support the transition away from coal globally, especially in emerging economies where financial support is paramount.
The priority for governments in Asia should be to target the coal plants in the pipeline to reduce reliance on coal. Innovative strategies that integrate the early retirement of coal plants with development of low-cost wind and solar and balancing services will ensure green growth is coupled with energy security.
Many Asian countries, keen to hold onto coal plants that are still relatively young, have tested co-firing with other fuels, such as ammonia or biomass, as a way to reduce the plant’s emissions. Such efforts were called out by the UK and Canada for encouraging extended coal use at the G7 in 2023.
Initial tests have shown that these nascent technologies will require new supply chains and expensive retrofits and reduce plant efficiency while cutting emissions far less than mature renewables would at the same cost. Looking ahead, although retrofits may ease short-term capital losses from early coal plant retirement, early retirement brings long-term benefits. Declining storage, solar and wind costs mean that replacing the entire coal fleet with clean energy could result in USD 105 billion in net annual savings by 2025, according to a 2020 report by Rocky Mountain Institute (RMI). By the end of the century, this is estimated to accumulate to a net gain of USD 78 trillion in benefits from avoiding the damage caused by climate change.
The flurry of announcements around co-firing testing initiatives has shown strong supply-led signals, but the demand signals are uncertain and pose significant risks. This can lead to inflated expectations as seen with the ‘hydrogen hype’ cycle – where hydrogen was touted as the next new low-carbon fuel but lacked binding off-takers due to higher-than-expected project costs that led many developers to cancel projects, including a renewable hydrogen project in Germany, a green hydrogen-to-methanol in Denmark and a blue hydrogen project in Norway.
A number of studies have addressed ways to make the early retirement of coal plants financially viable. The following are summaries of two studies by the Institute of Energy Economics and Finance (IEEFA) and Griffith Asia Institute addressing Asian examples of how this would work.
This report indicates there could be as many as 800 coal units globally with the right conditions to make this switch, a number of which are located in Southeast Asia. The study looked at five case studies where this model could be deployed with immediate effect. One of these is the 2.6-GW Mae Moh coal plant in Thailand. The new PPA deal would include 13.8 GW of solar PV capacity with battery storage enabling the plant to retire by 2026 and prevent 21 million tonnes of carbon dioxide emissions on an annual basis.
Plant-by-plant analysis showed that (1) early coal retirement increases enterprise value through refinancing for all plants; (2) refinancing combined with renewable energy investments more than triples the enterprise value compared to the value under the original PPA, and (3) younger plants can be retired relatively earlier as younger plant has more operating years that can be shaved off.
A key reason that coal-to-clean transition transactions are financially viable is the falling capital requirement of renewables. Analysis from RMI has shown that the upfront costs of solar will be lower than coal before 2030 for Vietnam and India, further incentivising no new coal. This is significant as, for many developing countries, the up-front cost of new infrastructure is a key obstacle and access to capital is limited.
The International Energy Agency also found that in Southeast Asia, growing the share of low-cost renewables in the energy mix will mean the average cost of electricity will fall from around USD 120 per megawatt hour (MWh) today – above the global average – to just under USD 100 per MWh by 2035 and to USD 80 per MWh by 2050.
For Asian countries to embrace this opportunity, resources should not be wasted on co-firing, which will require investment in new supply chains, is costly and can lead to mass deforestation for biomass. Co-firing will deliver only marginal emissions cuts that will not be ambitious enough to achieve the 2040 coal phase-out deadline for non-OECD countries. For a fair phase-out, developed nations must lead the way – with actions such as the UK closing its last coal plant in September 2024 – and deliver concessional, multilateral financing to support coal-dependent developing countries facing rising power demands to phase-out coal in line with global decarbonisation objectives.
Governments of coal-dependent countries, particularly those that are classed as developing, require sufficient access to finance – either concessional or multilateral – to enable their energy transition. Steps have been taken through initiatives such as the Energy Transition Mechanism and the Just Energy Transition Partnership (JETP) designed to support the coal- to- clean transition in South Africa, Indonesia and Vietnam. However, progress is slow and no material funding has been deployed so far under the JETP deals secured in 2022 by Indonesia and Vietnam.[4]BNEF (2024), Asia Pacific’s Energy Transition Outlook, available via BloombergNEF platform, accessed 1st November 2024.
Combining bottom-up and top-down approaches is key to a just coal phase-out. The Carbon Trust has provided principles to mitigate potentially negative socioeconomic effects on workers and local communities from early retirement of coal plants while embracing the benefits of moving to cleaner sources of energy:
Beyond meeting the 2040 coal phase-out target, retiring coal plants needs to be a just and managed process. This can be achieved through concessional/multilateral financing, as well as leveraging new innovative contracts that integrate renewable investments with the phasing-out of existing coal assets. First-movers of these models can set a replicable standard. By 2040, most existing coal plants in Asia will have recouped their initial investment costs. Prioritising smart solar and wind investments – which provided 500 TWh out of 600 TWh of demand growth in 2023 – rather than new coal plants will enable green growth in Asia.
References
↑1 | In this briefing Asia largely refers to East Asia. Southeast Asia and South Asia except when noted otherwise. |
---|---|
↑2 | Other papers have also looked into the payback period for China and India. |
↑3 | BNEF (2022) Japan’s Costly Ammonia Coal Co-Firing Strategy, available via BNEF platform, accessed on 24 October 2024. |
↑4 | BNEF (2024), Asia Pacific’s Energy Transition Outlook, available via BloombergNEF platform, accessed 1st November 2024. |
Attribution studies confirm the impact of fossil fuel-driven climate change on the intensity and frequency of droughts and floods.
Oil & Gas Decarbonization Charter member companies’ voluntary pledges threaten to further drive the climate crisis.